The Need and Feasibility of the UN to Lead the Human Community in Creating a Digital Planet(036)
— An Open Letter to UN Secretary-General Guterres and Global Sages
7.3.3.1.2 Principles for the Use of Shared Farm Shared Money and Reserve Funds
We all know that the so-called capitalist financial mechanism is actually a financial game. The rules of this game are made by people. Famland’s humanistic financial mechanism to be created on the digital earth is undoubtedly also a kind of financial game. Unlike capitalism, this is a decentralized distributed self-organized system with self-coordination, self-balance, and self-correction functions. These functions are often manifested in the form of “emergence” in the later stages. And even in “emergence,” it still depends on people, but it depends on the collective decision-making of more people. For Famland, there is still a relatively long exploration and experimentation process in the early stage. In this process, new rules, new orders, adjustments, and improvements will always exist. And with more and more people participating and working hard, it becomes better and more reasonable. Therefore, when we explain all the structures, patterns, and rules in this letter, we hope to explain as much as possible why we need to design this way. What is the purpose of the design and what effect should be achieved? What are the principles, spirit, or ideas it follows? To facilitate reference and learning for others. The highest power of the Famland new economic body in the future is F-DAO. All these rules may be re-modified or adjusted by F-DAO in the laterstage. Of course, it is not ruled out that in the early stage of launch, a new development and operation team may be formed by the United Nations or global experts to make modifications or adjustments. Moreover, in the future, other individuals or groups may build other types of metaverse or digital planets. In the construction, planning, design, and operation of the Famland metaverse, all the thinking, experience, information, and content are hoped to be open to everyone for reference or learning.
The rules for the use of shared farm shared money and reserve funds that will be described below also follow such a mindset and principle.
First of all, we need to realize that “BFM,” is a very important sub-ecosystem in the Famland new economic ecology, namely the “BFM sub-ecosystem.” There will be a specific discussion on this part later. Here, we just outline the main value logic briefly. In this sub-ecosystem, the nephrite collection fee and the BFM handling fee are a large amount of funds in the later stage. We cannot measure the extent of it yet. If we have to make an estimate, when the Famland new economic body enters the mature stage, this fund may account for 2–10% of the total economic volume of the entire economic body. How could this be so large?
This is also a consideration for Famland’s new economic body to “hiding wealth among the people” and “share value.” On the digital earth, each shared farm is a governance node and can be understood as a “meta-country.” Each “meta-country” can expand infinitely as long as its people (FN) approve. Therefore, shared farms are a new social structure in the metaverse and digital earth. After all, FN can freely migrate on the digital earth. I will go to the shared farm that I most approve of to develop. Therefore, in order to attract more new FN to enter, farms need to provide better services, more support, and larger benefits. All of these require funding, which comes from shared farm shared money.
Secondly, we also need to be clear that after Famland enters the mature stage, the nephrite collection fee will continue to rise, and the BFM cost will be greatly increased. The YL income brought by the increase of BFM’s shared value is no longer proportional to the BFM cost. At this time, the main significance of BFM is to create high-level “Glory Goods.” This means that the high BFM cost, or the “honorable product” upgrade fee, mainly contributes to the shared farm it belongs to. If this large amount of funds is used and utilized properly, it will greatly promote the development of Famland’s ecology and the progress of human society and civilization on the digital earth.
In our plan, it is best to use shared farm shared money for the “shared field rental” economic model. Under the public wallet of the farm, a large number of FN are opened with shared money and completed asset pledging, and then rented out as “shared fields” of the farm. Economic poor cultivators from any country or region in the world can activate KYC identity verification and harvest YL without paying a penny. When these cultivators become proficient in Famland and earn money, they can use the earned money to exchange for the 500 YL collateral that was initially invested in the shared farm. If they do not earn money, there is no risk for the cultivators. Once the exchange of the collateral in the FN is completed, the FN sovereignty can be fully owned by them.
Note that the economic model of this “shared field” is named rental but actually belongs to a real “sharing economy.” The so-called “sharing economy” that was popular a few years ago was just an alternative leasing model under the name of the “sharing economy.” This is a very innovative win-win model.
First, the wealthy can earn money in FN that they couldn’t earn before.
In the Famland ecosystem, no matter how rich you are, you can only have one FN, and at most one piece of wild land that can be invested with capital worth 10,000 YL. Other money cannot be used in this ecosystem. However, if you become a farmer and use the “shared field rental” model, you can invest heavily in opening up “shared fields.” After renting them out, each FN can receive a share of 2–10% of its earnings per day (this ratio can be adjusted and has nothing to do with the previously estimated BFM ratio of 2–10%). Even a return of 2%, or even lower, is a profit that cannot be expected in traditional capital markets. The most important thing is that this type of investment has extremely low risk. After the lessee earns money, they will mostly exchange the collateral that the wealthy invested. After the wealthy recover their costs, the rental income collected is the net profit. The only risk is that there may be some “impermanent loss” if no one rents the land. But there is also another part, the income from the collection of “Nephrite”. The wealthy also receive a share of this because the collection of Nephrite is largely based on luck. The good luck of collecting income usually greatly exceeds the bad luck of “unforeseen losses”. From this perspective, wealthy people investingin shared farms, opening up “shared fields,” and making money through the “shared field rental” model can generate substantial profits with almost zero risk.
Now, why have we been emphasizing fairness and trying to curb the wealthy from using capital to make big profits and disrupt the “fairness and inclusiveness” of the Famland ecosystem? Yet now we are encouraging capital to enter and make big profits. It’s because this model of making money with capital not only does not disrupt the “Universal fairness” of the Famland ecosystem, but also greatly promotes the healthy development of the ecosystem. More importantly, it effectively helps the poor in this world and fundamentally lifts them out of poverty. In other words, when this model is widely promoted, it can completely eliminate the poverty problem that human society has been striving for for thousands of years, but still cannot fundamentally solve.
Second, the poor can start without capital in FN and achieve financial freedom.
There are still nearly one billion people in the world who are food and clothing insecure and live in absolute poverty. Due to various factors such as climate, environment, wars, and disasters, it is almost impossible to find a truly effective model in the real world to help them out of poverty. However, as long as they can access the internet and have a mobile phone, they can quickly change their own destiny and also change the destiny of their country by using the “shared field rental” model without investing a penny.
After they strike gold in renting “shared fields”, they can use the money earned to exchange for the collateral of the wealthy, reclaim their complete personal sovereignty of FN. Then, they can migrate their FN back to the shared farm established in their own country, get rich themselves, and make their country prosperous and powerful. The specific discussion of this part will be addressed later. It will not be repeated here.
Is it that simple to solve the global poverty problem? Is it possible? Yes, when the Famland economy matures, it is that simple to solve the global poverty problem. It is completely possible. People like to use the phrase “Great Truth in Simple Words” to comment on things that others have done as too complicated. In fact, this is the biggest misunderstanding. “Great Truth in Simple Words” does not refer to doing things simply, but only to the results presented at theend being simple. It’s like a light bulb, which is very simple, just turn on the switch and it lights up. However, the generation, transmission, voltage transformation, and wiring behind it are definitely complex. Famland is also like this. To completely solve the global poverty problem with just one “shared field rental” model, the ideas, theories, logic, and large and small ecosystems that support this model must be in place at every step, and each step must be resonant. If any link is missing, this simple model cannot be established or truly effective.
If the farm shared money can be used and its effectiveness can be fully realized, not only will the lessors and lessees win, but the entire Famland ecosystem will win. It also greatly benefits human society and makes a huge contribution to human society. The contributors to this are worthy of the highest honors and praises in human society. So, who is the biggest contributor in this “shared field rental” model and BFM sub-ecosystem? Without a doubt, it is the creator of “Glory Goods”. It is their huge contribution that has created a huge amount of shared money in the shared farm, which has enabled the opening up of a large number of “shared fields”, and has helped billions of poor people in the world to fundamentally overcome poverty.
The owners of “Glory Goods” should receive recognition from the whole society (a sense of recognition). They should be immensely proud of the achievementsthey have gained through their hard work (a sense of accomplishment). They should also receive sincere respect and praise from the whole society (a sense of honor). This is why the blood of “Glory Goods” is infused with a sense of recognition, accomplishment, and honor.
The principles for using the farm reserve fund are basically the same. They are both aimed at promoting the healthy development of Famland’s new economy. The difference is that shared money focuses on the healthy development of the shared farm itself, while the reserve fund focuses on the healthy development of the entire Famland new economy. In our vision, when the Famland economy faces major challenges, dangers, or emergencies, the farm reserve fund can help turn the tide and stabilize the situation. For example, earlier this year, shortly after the public beta version of Famland was launched on the EOS public chain, it was hit by a hacker attack. Because our volume was too small, only worth about 50–60 thousand US dollars, we couldn’t get the EOS super nodes to use their freeze illegal assets permission to attack the hackers. We could only watch as several thousand dollars in assets were all lost in a matter of minutes. In the face of such emergencies, if there was a farm reserve fund, we could quickly make up for the tens of thousands of dollars gap. The entire public beta version ecosystem could continue and maintain its popularity. However, without reserve funds, after the liquidity pool assets are reduced to zero, the YL price theoretically goes to zero as well. This public beta experiment would have completely failed. Although the community eventually rallied and raised some funds to replenish the liquidity pool, it still did not completely prevent the YL price from dropping to zero. Such actions are not the natural lawof an ecosystem.
Therefore, the setting of the farm reserve fund is a fundamental strategy of “hiding wealth among the people” in a distributed self-organizing system. It is extremely important for a decentralized system to respond to emergencies. In our vision, the farm reserve fund should consider the interests of both parties: in emergencies, after F-DAO’s decision, funds can be directly allocated from the farm reserve fund pool to the stable pool or elsewhere without the approval of the farm members or farm owners. On the other hand, if the reserve fund reaches a certain amount, such as more than 10,000 YL per capita for farm members, the excess can be transferred to the farm shared gold pool. This not only takes into account the interests of large and small collectives but also gives the entire Famland ecosystem strong resilience, balance, and self-healing capabilities when facing unknown economic shocks.
Speaking of which, we need to clarify the basic principles of Famland’s distributed self-organizing system. The basic principle is that nodes have complete autonomy. If the shared farm is a node in the distributed self-organizing ecosystem of Famland, then theoretically, the node has complete autonomy over its own assets. This is why, when we discuss the use of shared farm shared gold and reserve funds, we don’t just talk about the settings and rules, but emphasize our intentions and design ideas. Because the specific use of shared farm shared gold and reserve funds, and the real authorityshould belong to the farm owners and all members of the farm. Unless these nodes, these shared farms collectively vote on a decision, everyone should naturally abide by that decision. Otherwise, regardless of what others think, say, or suggest, the final decision still lies with the shared farm itself. As planners and designers, we can only guide from the perspective of the benefits and drawbacks of the ecosystem. For example, if your shared farm is not willing to use shared money for “shared field rental” while other farms are doing so, then FN, which has the willingness to create “Glory Goods,” may not develop in your shared farm. Alternatively, this shared farm may not want to launch the “shared field rental” model, but it may discover another model that is more attractive to new users and “Glory Goods” creators. These are the most dynamic aspects of the Famland ecosystem.
The planning and design of the entire Famland ecosystem are following the basic principles of the distributed node new economy, where the core is the autonomy of the nodes. For FN, the “private domain territory” function and structural settings reflect the personal sovereignty of the ultimate nodes. However, for shared farms, which are governance nodes, it is still necessary to explore what their node rights and scope of rights are, which is most beneficial for a distributed self-organizing system and the entire Famland ecosystem. This is why Famland needs to be constructed as an open, distributed, and self-organizing ecosystemthat everyone can participate in and make decisions. This allows for correct functional adjustments and rule adjustments to effectively emerge in the future. As for the current stage, as long as the use of shared farm shared money and reserve funds is beneficial to the healthy development of the Famland ecosystem, we believe that how to use them and how to set rules is reasonable.
(To be continued)
The English translation is mainly done by AI and is inevitably not accurate enough. Please refer to the original Chinese text below for a more accurate understanding.
联合国引领人类社会打造数字地球的必要性和可行性（036）
— — 致联合国秘书长古特雷斯及全球贤达的公开信
7.3.3.1.2 共享农场共享金、储备金利用原则
我们都知道，所谓资本主义金融机制，实际就是一套金融游戏。这个游戏中的规则，是由人来制定的。数字地球上，Famland要打造的人本主义金融机制，无疑也是一种金融游戏。与资本主义不同的是，这是一套去中心化的分布式自组织系统，有自协调、自平衡、自修正功能。这些功能在后期往往是以“涌现”的形式发挥作用的。而即便是“涌现”，也依然取决于人，只不过是取决于更多人的集体决策。对于Famland来说，前期还有一个比较长的探索、实验过程。在这个过程中，新规则、新秩序的调整和完善会一直存在。并在越来越多的人参与和努力下，变得越来越好、越来越合理。因此，我们在这封信中阐述所有结构、模式和规则时，都希望尽可能说明为什么要这么设计。设计的目的是什么，要达到一个什么效果。其依照的原则、精神或思路是什么。便于其他人参考和借鉴。Famland新经济体未来的最高权力机构是F-DAO。所有这些规则，后期都有可能由F-DAO来重新修改或调整。当然，也不排除在前期启动时，就由联合国或全球贤达组建新的开发运营团队来进行修改或调整。不仅如此，未来，其他个人或团体在打造其他类型的元宇宙，或其他类型的数字星球时。Famland元宇宙在构建、规划、设计和运作中，所有的思考、经验、信息、内容，都希望开放给大家参考或借鉴。下面阐述的农场共享金、储备金使用规则，也是遵循着这样一个思路、一个准则。
首先，我们要意识到，”BFM”，是属于Famland新经济生态中的一个很重要的子生态，也就是“BFM子生态”。这个部分后面还有专门的论述，这里，仅仅是简要勾勒一下主要价值逻辑。在这个子生态中，Nephrite采集费与BFM手续费，在后期是一笔体量很大的资金。大到什么程度，今天我们还无法衡量。如果要勉强做个估测的话，当Famland新经济体进入成熟期后，这笔资金有可能占到整个经济体经济总量的2–10%。怎么会有这么大呢？
这也是Famland新经济体“藏富于民”、“价值共享”的一种思考。在数字地球上，每一个共享农场，都是一个治理节点，可以将它们理解为一个“元国家”。每一个“元国家”，都可以无限扩大，只要它的人民（FN）认同。所以，共享农场是一套元宇宙数字地球上的新型社会结构。毕竟FN是可以在数字地球上自由迁徙的，我最认可哪个共享农场，就去哪里发展。那么，农场为了吸引更多新FN进入，就要提供更好的服务、提供更多的扶持、提供更大的福利。这些都需要资金，资金哪里来，就来自农场共享金。
其次，我们还需要清楚。Famland进入成熟期后，Nephrite采集费会一直上涨，BFM成本会极大提高。BFM提高共享值带来的YL收益，已经与BFM成本不成正比。这时候，BFM的主要意义就在于打造高等级的“荣耀品”了。这就是说，高昂的BFM成本费、也就是“荣耀品”升级费，主要是为所在共享农场做了贡献。如果这笔巨量资金使用的好、利用得当，将会极大促进Famland生态发展，极大促进数字地球上人类社会进步和人类文明发展。
在我们的规划中，农场共享金最好是用于“共享田出租”经济模式。就是在农场公共钱包名下，用共享金开辟大量FN，并完成资产质押，然后作为农场的“共享田”对外出租。全球任何国家和地区的经济贫困耕作者，无需支付一分钱，就可以KYC实名激活收获YL了。等到这些耕作者操作熟练了，在Famland中赚了钱之后，再用赚的钱，去置换出共享农场当初投入的500YL质押金。如果没有赚钱，耕作者一分钱风险都没有。而一旦完成了FN中质押金的置换，就可将FN主权完整归属到自己名下了。
注意这个“共享田”的经济模式，名为出租，实质上属于真正的“共享经济”。而前些年火爆一时的所谓“共享经济”，只不过是打着“共享经济”名头的一种另类租赁模式而已。这是一种非常有新意的同赢、共赢模式。
第一，富人能在FN中赚到他们本来赚不到的钱。
在Famland生态中。无论你多么有钱，你个人也只能有一块FN，最多一块野田能投入价值1万YL的资本。其他的钱，在这个生态中发挥不了作用。但是，如果你成为了农场主，利用“共享田出租”模式，就可以大量投资开辟“共享田”，出租后，每块FN每天可获得其收益2–10%的分成（这个比例是可以调整的，跟前面估测的BFM占比2–10%没有任何关系）。即使是2%，甚至更低，都是在传统资本市场上不敢奢望的收益。最关键在于，这种投资风险极低。租赁者赚了钱后，多半都会将富人投入的质押金置换出来。富人收回成本后，前面收的租金就是净利润了。唯一的风险，就是没人租赁时，有可能最终承担一部分“无常损失”。可是，还有另外一部分，“Nephrite”的采集收入。这部分富人也是有分成的，因为Nephrite的采集，很大程度上是凭运气。而采集收益的好运，通常会大大超过“无常损失”的坏运。这样来看，富人们投资共享农场、开辟“共享田”，用“共享田出租”模式赚钱，盈利可观，而风险几乎为零。
为什么我们前面一直在强调公平性，强调要遏制有钱人利用资本赚大钱，破坏Famland生态的“普惠性公平”。而现在却要鼓励资本进入，鼓励资本赚大钱。因为，资本用这种模式赚钱，不但没有破坏Famland生态的“普惠性公平”，反而极大地促进了生态的健康发展。更重要的是，有效帮助这个世界上的穷人，让他们从根本上脱贫。也就是说，当这种模式被推而广之时，可以彻底消除人类社会的贫困现象。这可是人类社会几千年始终在努力追求，可至今也无法从根本上解决的最大难题。
第二，穷人能在FN中无本起家，实现财富自由。
世界上还有近10亿食不果腹、衣不遮体，处在绝对贫困线上的穷人。由于气候、环境、战乱、灾难等多种因素制约，在现实世界中，几乎找不到真正有效帮助他们脱贫的模式。但是，只要他们能上网，有一部手机。利用“共享田出租”模式，他们就能在一分钱不投入的情况下。迅速改变自己的命运，也同时改变自己国家的命运
他们在租用“共享田”淘到第一桶金后。即可用赚到的钱置换出富人的质押金，收回FN的完整个人主权。紧接着，他们可以将自己的FN迁徙回自己国家组建的共享农场中，在自己致富的同时，也让国家富裕和强大起来。这一部分的具体论述放到后面专门进行。这里不再赘述。
解决全球的贫困问题，就这么简单？这可能吗？
是的，当Famland经济体成熟后，解决全球人类的贫困问题就这么简单。这完全可能。人们很喜欢用“大道至简”这句话，来点评对方做的事情太复杂。其实，这是一个最大的误解。“大道至简”绝不是指做事简单，而只是最后呈现出来的结果很简单。就跟电灯很简单，一按开关就亮了。可是，它背后发电、传送、变压、布线，绝对是复杂的。Famland也是这样，彻底解决全球贫困问题，就一个“共享田出租”模式。可是，背后为支撑这个模式的思想、理论、逻辑，以及大生态、小生态，每一步都要到位，每一步都要呼应，缺少一个环节。这个简单的模式就无法成立，或者说无法真正有效。
如果农场共享金能这么使用，能这么发挥其效能。那么，不仅出租人赢、承租人赢，整个Famland生态赢。更是极大地造福了人类社会，为人类社会做出了极大贡献。这里面的贡献者，值得享受人类社会最高的荣誉和褒奖。那么，这个“共享田出租”模式，这个BFM子生态，里面最大的贡献者是谁？毫无疑问，就是“荣耀品”的打造者。是他们的巨大付出，才有了共享农场的巨量共享金，有了巨量共享金才能开辟出巨量“共享田”，有了巨量“共享田”，才能帮助世界上亿万穷人从根本上脱贫。
“荣耀品”的拥有者，应该得到全社会的认同（认同感）、应该为自己努力所获得的成就无比自豪（成绩感），应该得到全社会由衷地尊敬和褒奖（荣誉感）。之所以说，“荣耀品”的血液里，都浸透着“认同感”、“成就感”和“荣誉感”，就是这么来的。
农场储备金的使用原则，基本道理都一样。都是为了让Famland新经济体健康发展。只不过，共享金侧重于共享农场自身的健康发展，储备金侧重于整个Famland新经济体的健康发展。在我们的设想中，当Famland经济体面临重大挑战、危险或突发事件时，农场储备金能在关键时刻，力挽狂澜、扶大厦于将倾。比如，今年初，Famland公测版上线EOS公链后不久，遭遇黑客攻击。由于我们体量太小，只有5–6万美元的价值。没法让EOS超级节点动用他们冻结不合法资产权限狙击黑客。只能眼睁睁看着几万美元的资产，在几十分钟内全部归零。在这样的突发事件面前，如果有农场储备金，迅速补齐这几万美元的缺口。整个公测版的生态还有望继续，整个公测版的人气还有望维持。可是，没有储备资金，流动池资产归零后，YL价格理论上也就归零了。这个公测版实验就彻底失败了。虽然最后社区努力，又筹集了一点资金充实到流动池中。没有让YL价格彻底归零。但这样的做法，终究不是一个生态系统的自然应对法则。
所以，农场储备金的设置，就是分布式自组织系统中，一种“藏富于民”的根本性策略。它对于一个去中心化系统应对突发事变，极其重要。在我们的设想中，农场储备金应该兼顾两方面的利益：一方面，在紧急情况下，经过F-DAO的决议，可以直接从农场储备金池中划拨到稳定池或其它地方。无需农场成员和农场主批准。另一方面，储备金达到一定数额，比如农场成员人均储备金超过1万YL。超过部分就可以转入农场共享金池了。这既兼顾了大集体和小集体的利益，更让整个Famland生态，在面临未知的巨大经济冲击时，具有强大的抗衡能力、平衡能力和自愈能力。
说到这里，我们有必要更清晰的阐述一下Famland的分布式自组织系统的基本原则。这个基本原则，就是节点具有完全的自主权。如果共享农场是Famland这个分布式自组织生态的节点。那么，理论上，节点对属于自己的资产，是拥有完全自主权的。这就可以理解，为什么我们在谈到农场共享金和储备金时，不是直接谈设定、谈规则，而一直在强调我们的初衷、我们的设计思想。因为，共享农场共享金和储备金具体该怎么利用，真正的权限应该在这个农场的农场主、以及全体成员们身上。除非这些节点、这些共享农场共同投票做出了决定。那么，大家自然应该遵守这个决定。否则，无论其他人怎么想、怎么说、怎么建议，最终决定权，依然在共享农场自己手上。而我们，作为规划者、设计者，只能从生态环境的利弊上去引导。比如，如果你共享农场不愿意将共享金用作“共享田出租”，而其他农场在这么做。那么，具有“荣耀品”打造意愿的FN，有可能就不会去你的共享农场发展。又或许，这家共享农场虽然不愿意推出“共享田出租”模式，但是他发现了一个另外的模式，对新用户、对“荣耀品”打造者更有吸引力。而这些，才是Famland生态最具活力之所在。
整个Famland生态的规划和设计，我们都在尽最大可能遵循分布式节点新经济的一些基本原则，这里面的核心就是节点权利。对于终极节点FN而言，“私域领土”功能和结构设置，很好地体现了节点的个人主权。但对于共享农场这种治理节点来说，究竟怎么确定它的节点权利和权利范围，对一个分布式自组织系统、对整个Famland生态才是最有利的。还需要进一步探索。也正因为如此，Famland才更需要构建成一个开放式、分布式，人人能参与、人人能决策的自组织生态。让正确的功能调整、规则调整，能在未来的“涌现”中有效呈现。至于现阶段，只要共享农场共享金、储备金的利用，有利于Famland生态的健康发展，怎么使用、怎么立规矩，我们认为都是合理的。
（未完待续）
