The Need and Feasibility of the UN to Lead the Human Community in Creating a Digital Planet(043)
— An Open Letter to UN Secretary-General Guterres and Global Sages
8.1.2 Growth Phase
In the Famland ecosystem, when the first “Glory Goods” is created, or the total amount of funds in the stable pool reaches 2 billion YL, we believe that the startup capital of the Archangels has successfully launched the Famland new economic ecosystem. Famland can now enter a phase of full promotion and rapid development, with a growth phase time budget of 24–42 months and a development focus on the shared farm. The angel plan mentioned earlier is actually a shared farm development plan. The difference is that the angel plan has a commitment to pledged funds and belongs to social public welfare investment, with a relatively simple operating model. The operation of the shared farm during the growth phase belongs to pure commercial investment, and the operating model will be more diverse. The overall goal of the growth phase is to develop and enable more people in the world to share the benefits of the Famland new economic ecosystem. Regardless of the form, as long as users can come into contact with Famland, it is a success.
8.1.2.1 Security of the Famland Financial System
In recent years, people have often heard of hacking incidents in the field of encrypted digital economy. It seems that no blockchain-based economy has been spared, including the Famland public beta version, which was also hit by a devastating attack by hackers. Therefore, it is inevitable to have some concerns about the security of the Famland new economic ecosystem as it enters the growth phase. Once a large amount of FN is activated and the economic volume reaches several hundred billion to tens of trillions of dollars, if there are security issues again, the consequences will be too serious.
Undoubtedly, security is the top priority for all blockchain projects, including Famland. Generally speaking, it is not only necessary to consider hacking attacks at the technical and contract levels, but also to consider vulnerability attacks on the business model. Although there have been hacking and vulnerability incidents, the security of blockchain technology, including the security of encrypted digital economies built around blockchain technology, has been tested in practice. Apart from early large-scale malicious cases such as the Mt. Gox incident and the Ethereum fork incident, there have been very few serious security incidents of this kind in recent years. Therefore, overall security assurance in the encrypted digital economy industry is generally recognized.
It is also for the consideration of security and convenience that after repeated comparisons and testing, Famland has finally chosen the EOS public chain. This is not only because of the technical level of the EOS public chain, which has long been ranked first in the public chain ranking of the China Academy of Information and Communications Technology under the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology. It is also because of its security, which is considered the strongest in the industry. Its Dpos consensus mechanism, also known as the “super node,” has only 21 nodes. The response speed is extremely fast, and in case of major abnormal events, it can freeze digital assets on the EOS chain in the first time. Therefore, there are very few large-scale hacking incidents on the EOS public chain. Even if the hackers succeed in attacking, the super nodes may have frozen their illegal funds before the funds are transferred. Although the EOS super node mechanism is criticized by the industry for its lack of decentralization, it is more reliable and trustworthy in terms of security.
As for the hacking of Famland’s public beta fund pool, it was actually a low-level mistake made by our community. During testing, we used a temporary token to replace Usdt, but forgot to replace it when the public beta was launched, which gave the hacker an opportunity. Also, due to the small amount of funds involved (just over $50,000), the super nodes did not detect it, and the community did not establish a multi-signature management mechanism, which allowed the hacker to succeed.
In fact, during formal operation, Famland’s security mechanisms are fully controllable. As we have explained in the previous section on the new economic model, this is a relatively stable financial ecosystem. The production, distribution, and trading of digital assets are all within a calculable range on a daily basis. Once there is any abnormal activity beyond this range, the system can immediately sound an alarm. The community’s multi-signature wallet managers can temporarily freeze all assets with one click, and no matter how the hacker exploits the vulnerability, the funds cannot be transferred in the end. This is only the security safeguard within the Famland system. Outside the system, there is also the underlying security safeguard of the EOS public chain mentioned earlier. Therefore, under the protection of multiple emergency security mechanisms, Famland’s security can be assured. Moreover, in any field, risks and security always coexist. There is no absolute security or absolute risk. As human technology and civilization continue to advance and develop in this dialectical relationship, risks and security will always coexist.
8.1.2.2 Risks of Famland’s financial system
As for the risk of Famland’s financial system, what people are more concerned about is the impact of digital currencies on traditional economic markets. For example, if hundreds of millions of poor people can easily earn money in Famland, and each person can increase their income by tens of thousands of dollars a year, once this money flows into traditional markets, such as the food market, it will cause a surge in global food prices. If this money is used to shop in other markets, it will also cause a surge in the prices of those markets. This concern should be the most puzzling issue for people since the birth of blockchain digital currencies. Although we have made a special explanation on this issue in the previous section, in practical operation, people are still not clear about how to control and avoid the risks to traditional economic markets.
A， From a market perspective。
there are three layers of meaning.
First, the goods related to clothing, food, housing, and transportation are not scarce, but abundant. Even the scarcest food, such as grain, is already abundant enough to feed the world’s 8 billion people. This is very important because sufficient food is produced in the hope that someone will buy it. However, the current situation is that many poor people do not have enough money to buy sufficient food. Therefore, there is excess food wasted or converted into higher-level food (such as meat).
Secondly, when the wealth of human society grows rapidly, the prices of goods related to clothing, food, housing, and transportation usually rise in line with inflation. For example, in the past 50–60 years, the growth rate of global wealth has been the fastest in history.
This has been explained in the previous Figure 71. The total wealth of human society has increased at least two to three times in the past 50–60 years. The speed of wealth growth is unprecedented in history. Meanwhile, the price of food has also increased in sync.
However, as shown in Figure 107, the nominal price of food has also increased several times in the past 60 years. But if calculated based on constant prices, that is, the real price after subtracting inflation, it has remained relatively stable. This data fully demonstrates that even if social wealth has experienced tremendous growth, or even skyrocketing, the real price of food does not change much. This was still the case when global food supply was not so abundant in the early days. Nowadays, global food supply is more sufficient. Therefore, even if Famland brings about significant wealth growth, it will not cause catastrophic price surges for commodities related to clothing, food, housing, and transportation such as food. Instead, prices will remain relatively stable and in line with inflation.
Finally, as mentioned repeatedly earlier, there is always a limit to human consumption of material goods, and it is not unlimited. For example, I can only eat 30 kg of grain a month, and any more would be wasted. I only need one air conditioner in a room, and having more is useless. In other words, no matter how much money I have, I will only buy 30 kg of grain a month and one air conditioner in 1–2 years. Therefore, in the end, as long as the supply of these material goods is sufficient, no matter how many times the total wealth of human society increases, the price growth of these material goods will always be limited. Because the supply is sufficient, no one can monopolize a certain commodity. If you want to raise prices, others can supply at a fair price, and in the end, you will not be able to sell your goods.
B， From the financial perspective。
some may continue to question whether commodities such as clothing, food, housing, and transportation have limited consumption. However, with the money I easily earn in Famland, I can buy houses, land, stocks, futures, oil, and gold mines. I can use any amount of money to buy these assets, right?
Yes, but why do you want to buy these assets? Obviously, it is not for personal use or consumption, but to make money. The purpose of buying these assets is to increase your capital. If so, we have already done the math earlier. Even for the angel’s investment with a public welfare nature, the annualized rate is over 100%. The commercialized shared farm investment has even higher returns and almost no risk. Which of these traditional assets has such a high rate of return and such a low risk rate?
I do not trust Famland’s digital assets, I trust traditional assets more. Therefore, even if your rate of return is higher, I am still not reassured. And I will invest all the money I earn in traditional assets. I think that is safer.
It is not denied that there must be many people who have the same understanding and mentality as you in the beginning. But please note: according to our business model, no one can immediately earn a lot of wealth in Famland during the initial launch period, including the establishment period. Even the angel’s investment of 200 million US dollars will not recover its cost until one year later. The huge wealth created by Famland in the initial stage is scattered among the millions of people and millions of FN. After one year or more, you may be a bit hesitant to use the money you earned in Famland to invest in traditional assets. Because over the past year, Famland has been very stable in helping you create huge profits. Are you really willing to give it up?
Okay, even if you are willing to give it up, there are still many other people who invest in traditional assets and see how much money Famland is making. They are also likely to withdraw some of their assets and invest them in Famland. In any case, the profit-seeking nature of capital determines that it will flow where the returns are high. Therefore, as long as Famland has a high investment rate of return and sustainable profitability, not only will the capital in the traditional financial industry not enter the Famland new financial ecosystem in large quantities, but the capital in the traditional financial industry will also enter the Famland new financial ecosystem in large quantities. These have been analyzed in the previous section and will not be repeated.
8.1.2.3 The extraordinary expansibility and universality of shared farm operations
With safety and risk concerns eliminated, Famland can freely promote and expand. In our plan, the main driving force of the growth period is the operation and development of shared farms. The operating model of shared farms has extraordinary expansibility. Once it starts operating, it can quickly increase the number of FNs in the largest possible range, which is the magic weapon for the rapid expansion of Famland during the growth period.
We know that the higher the average sharing value of a shared farm, the higher the APY that all FNs in the farm can enjoy. Therefore, the competition between shared farms is mainly about how to quickly increase the sharing value. There are two ways to increase the sharing value of FNs, one is the conventional model, which is to increase it through “sharing amount” and “sharing value limit”. The other is the merged field model, which is the “BFM” model.
A， Let’s first talk about the conventional mode.
Let’s take one FN as an example, and assume it is an A-FN. We need to stake its YL earnings in a new FN to generate a “Shared money quota”. This quota can be converted into a shared value as long as it is within the “shared value quota”. However, there is a problem here. The new FN generated by staking must be leased out and activated to generate income through KYC certification. The rental income is the daily income that A-FN can extract. If the new FN cannot be leased out and there is no rental income, it means that A-FN cannot generate income on a daily basis, and can only continuously increase the shared value. This is something that no cultivator would like to see. The only solution is for the owner of A-FN to constantly promote and promote Famland, and quickly find new FN lessees. This operation will not have any problems in the early stage. After all, everyone has a lot of relatives and friends around them who can make money just by doing KYC certification without investing. This is easy. When every FN promotes like this, the growth rate of new FNs will of course be very fast.
However, friends and family are always limited, while the increase in shared value is unlimited. Further expansion is more difficult to achieve alone. Often, more people need to cooperate and operate together.
B， Let’s talk about the BFM model again.
In the BFM mode, multiple FNs with a certain shared value are required to operate. But where to find so many FNs with shared value? The market is one aspect, but where do the FNs with shared value in the market come from? After all, one person can only activate one FN. This forces the BFM sub-ecosystem to give birth to a new industry, the specialized BFM industry. This industry is dedicated to cultivating shared value for FNs and then putting them on the market for profit. In other words, they use FNs as commodities to create profits from FN shared value development instead of YL earnings.
To engage in such an industry, a group of “Certify Worker” is required. The so-called “Certify Worker” are digital citizens who specialize in KYC certification, do not operate FNs themselves, and may not even enter the Famland ecosystem. BFM practitioners find them only to do KYC certification for them and pay them how much money for each certification. All subsequent operations are the responsibility of the practitioners. After the practitioners activate and cultivate the FNs, they can sell them on the market, and then come back to find them to do KYC certification for a new FN. This cycle continues. However, if the “Certify Worker” have a certain level of education and can use the Internet on their phones, they will quickly learn the truth and will directly enter Famland to become cultivators. They will no longer work as “Certify Worker” to earn the small fee for certification.
In this case, if the practitioners want to obtain relatively stable “Certify Worker” within a certain time frame, they can only go deeper into more remote and impoverished areas. Because there may be some poor people with low education levels who do not even know how to operate a mobile phone or use the Internet. There, they may obtain greater and more stable information asymmetry dividends. We believe that this is also what BFM practitioners deserve. Because they have made more arduous efforts and helped people who are not easy to help. They even go to help Sudanese refugees, Yemeni refugees, Afghan refugees, Mexican refugees… It is not that their morality is particularly noble, but they want to make more money. In the Famland ecosystem, if you want to make more money, you can only achieve it by helping others.
The above is just a simple deduction from these two aspects. Once the shared farm mode starts to operate, various promotion modes, publicity modes, and expansion modes will emerge. Perhaps, many of them are still unimaginable or undeducible for us now. But the result is to allow the value of Famland to be shared by the poorest people in the world, even in the most remote areas. Let the sunshine of “Universal fairness” of the Famland new economic body illuminate every corner of human society.
When the total amount of funds in the stable pool reaches 200 billion YL, or the total amount of shared gold in the shared farm exceeds 200 billion YL, we believe that the growth period of the Famland new economic body is over and it can enter the mature period.
(To be continued)
The English translation is mainly done by AI and is inevitably not accurate enough. Please refer to the original Chinese text below for a more accurate understanding.
联合国引领人类社会打造数字地球的必要性和可行性（043）
— — 致联合国秘书长古特雷斯及全球贤达的公开信
8.1.2 成长期
在Famland生态中，当第一块“荣耀品”诞生，或者稳定池资金总额达到20亿YL时。我们就认为，大天使的启动资金，已经成功将Famland新经济体生态启动。Famland可以进入全力推广、迅速发展的成长期了。成长期的时间预算是24–42个月，发展重点是共享农场。前面说的天使计划，其实也就是一种共享农场发展计划。只不过天使计划对质押金有承诺，属于社会化公益投资，运作模式也比较单一化。而成长期的共享农场运作，属于纯粹的商业投资了，运作模式也会比较丰富。成长期的总体目标是发展，让这个世界上更多的人能够共享Famland新经济体的红利。无论是什么形式，只要能让用户接触到Famland，就是一种成功。
8.1.2.1 Famland金融体系的安全性
这么些年来，人们经常听到加密数字经济领域的黑客攻击事件。大大小小的区块链经济体似乎都未能幸免。再加上Famland公测版也遭遇到了黑客的毁灭性攻击。因此，不免会对Famland新经济体的安全性问题产生一些担心。一旦进入成长期，大量FN被激活，经济体量也达到几千亿、数万亿美元的规模。此时，如果再出现安全性问题，那后果就太严重了。
毫无疑问，安全性问题是所有区块链项目、包括Famland的首要问题。一般来说，不仅要考虑技术、合约层面的黑客攻击，还要考虑商业模式的漏洞攻击。可尽管黑客攻击事件、漏洞事件时有发生。但是，区块链技术的安全性，包括以区块链技术为核心构建的加密数字经济体的安全性，已经得到了实践检验。除了早期像门头沟事件、以太坊分叉事件等大型恶性案例外，近年来，已经极少出现这类大型的严重安全事故了。所以说，总体的安全性保障，在加密数字经济业界，还是得到公认的。
也正是出于安全性和便捷性的考虑，Famland在经过反复比较和试验后，最终选择了EOS公链。不仅因为EOS公链的技术水准，在中国工信部旗下的赛迪研究院公链排名中长期名列第一。更因为其安全性，也是业界认为最强的。其Dpos共识机制，也就是俗称的“超级节点”，由于只有21个。反应速度极快，只要发生重大异常事件，可以在第一时间冻结EOS链上的数字资产。因此，在EOS公链上，极少发生大额度的黑客攻击事件。就是因为，黑客即使攻击成功。不等你资金转移，超级节点可能已经冻结了你的非法资金。虽然EOS的这种超级节点机制，被业界质疑去中心化程度不够，但至少在安全性方面来说，是更靠谱、更值得信任的。
至于Famland公测版资金池被黑客攻击，其实是我们社区自己犯的一个低级错误。测试时使用的临时替代Usdt，公测上线时忘了替换掉。给了黑客一个机会。又由于资金量较小（5万多美元），超级节点监测不到，社区自己的多签管理机制也没建立，没有及时冻结这些非法资产，才让黑客得手。
事实上，正式运行时，Famland的安全机制是完全可控的。通过前面的新经济体商业模式，我们很清楚，这是一个具有相对稳定性的金融生态。数字资产的产出、分配、交易，每天都在一个可计算范畴内。一旦出现超过这个范围的异动，系统可以立即报警。社区多签钱包管理者可以一键临时冻结所有资产，无论黑客用什么方式钻到了漏洞，最终资金也转移不了。这还仅仅是Famland系统内的安全保障。系统外，还有前面介绍的EOS公链的底层安全保障。所以，在多重紧急安全机制保护下，Famland在安全性方面是可以放心的。再说了，无论在什么领域，风险和安全始终是伴随着的。没有绝对的安全，也没有绝对的风险。道高一尺魔高一丈，人类技术、人类文明也正是在这样的阴阳相生相克中前进和发展的。
8.1.2.2 Famland金融体系的风险性
这里指的风险性，是人们更担心的数字货币冲击传统经济市场的风险性。比如，如果数亿穷人那样轻松的就能在Famland中赚到钱，而且，每个人一年就可凭空增加上几万美元的收入。这些钱一旦涌进传统市场，比如粮食市场。那还不得造成全球粮价暴涨。如果这些钱去到其他市场购物，不就得造成这些市场的物价暴涨？这种担心，应该是自从区块链数字货币诞生后，人们最想不明白的地方。尽管我们在中篇对这个问题做过专门的阐述，但是，具体到实际操作、实际运作中，人们还是不清楚，这种对传统经济市场的风险是怎么控制、怎么规避的。
这个问题还是分两个角度来阐述。一个是市场角度。另一个是金融角度。
A， 先说市场角度。从市场角度来看，有三层意思。第一层，衣食住行等商品是充足的；第二层意思，就算衣食住行等商品涨价也是与通货膨胀持平的。第三层意思，物质商品的消费终归是有限度的。
首先，我们应该清楚的一点，就是现实世界中的衣食住行等商品，不是不足，而是有余。即便以最紧缺的粮食来说，养活全球80亿人已经绰绰有余。这一点非常重要，充足的粮食生产出来了，就是希望有人买。而现在的情况是，由于许多穷人没钱买足够的粮食。所以，全球有多余的粮食被损耗掉、浪费掉，或者，转化为更高级的食品（比如肉类）。
其次，当人类社会的财富获得巨大增长时，衣食住行等相关商品的涨价也多半是与通货膨胀持平的。比如，最近这50–60年来，全球财富的增长速度是历史上最快的。
这点，在前面的图71中已经有过说明。人类社会的财富总量，在最近这50–60年的时间内，翻了至少2–3番。财富暴增的速度是历史上前所未有的。而这期间呢，粮食的价格也在同步增长。
可是，正如图107所显示的那样，60多年来，粮食价格名义上也涨了好几倍。可如果按不变价格计算，也就是剔除通货膨胀后的真实价格，基本是持平的。这一数据充分说明，即使是社会财富获得了极大的增长、甚至暴涨，粮食的真实价格，其实并不会有太大变化。这还是在早期，全球粮食供应并不是那么充足的情况下。现在，全球粮食供应愈发充足了。所以，即便是Famland带来了再大的财富增长，对粮食等与衣食住行相关的商品价格，也不会造成灾难性的暴涨。而会始终与通货膨胀基本持平。
最后，前面也一再指出过。人类对物质商品的消费总是有个限度的，不会无限消费。比如，我一个月只能吃50斤粮食，再多我就吃不了，就要浪费掉了。我一个房间只需要一部空调，再多几部也没用啊。也就是说，无论我再有钱，买粮食一个月只会买50斤，买空调1–2年只会买一部。所以，说到底，只要这些物质商品的供应量充足。无论人类社会的总财富再增加多少倍，这些物质商品价格的增长也始终是有限的。因为供应量充足，没有人可以垄断某种商品。如果你硬要抬高价格，其它人可以平价供应，最后，你反而卖不出去。
B，再说金融角度。有人会继续质疑，衣食住行这类商品可能消费有限。但是，我可以用在Famland中轻松赚到的钱，去买房、买地、买股票、买期货、买石油、买金矿呀。买这些资产，多少钱我都用得出去，对吧。
是的，可是，你为什么要买这些资产呢，显然不是自己住、自己用、自己消费，而是想赚钱。买这些资产的目的是想让自己的资本增值。如果是这样，那么，前面我们已经算过账了。即使是大天使的公益性质的投资，年化率都在100%以上。商业化共享农场投资回报率更高，而且，几乎没有风险。投资上面这些传统资产，哪一种有这么高的回报率，有这么低的风险率？
我不相信Famland的数字资产，我更相信传统资产。所以，即使你回报率再高，我都不放心。而会把赚来的钱都投入到传统资产中。我认为这样更保险。
不否认，最初一定有很多与你认知和心态都相同的人。但请注意：按照我们的商业模式，在Famland的最初启动期、包括成立期，没有人可以立即赚到大量财富。即使是投资2亿美元的大天使，收回成本也要到1年以后了。Famland初期创造的巨大财富，都分散到亿万老百姓、亿万FN中了。1年或更长时间后，你再想用在Famland中赚到的钱去投传统资产，可能多少会有点纠结。因为，这一年多来，Famland非常稳定的在帮你创造巨大收益。真舍得放弃？
好吧，就算你真舍得放弃，还有很多其他投资传统资产的人，看到Famland这么赚钱。也极可能会撤出一部分资产投到Famland中来。总之一点，资本的逐利性注定了哪里回报高它们就会涌向哪里。所以，只要Famland有较高的投资回报率、有持久赚钱的见证。不仅Famland新金融生态中的资本不会大量进入传统金融领域，反过来，传统金融产业中的资本会大批量进入Famland新金融生态。这些，前面中篇也早都分析过了，就不再赘述。
8.1.2.3 共享农场运作的超常规扩张性和普惠性
排除了安全性和风险性顾虑，Famland就可以放开手推广、扩张了。在我们规划中，成长期的主要推动力，就是共享农场的运作和发展。共享农场的运作模式，具有超常规的扩张性。一旦运作起来，可以在最大范围内迅速增加FN的数量，是Famland成长期得以快速扩张的法宝。
我们知道，共享农场的平均共享值越高，农场中所有FN可享受到的APY就越高。因此，共享农场之间的竞争，主要就是如何迅速提高共享值的竞争。而提高FN共享值的模式无外乎两种，一种是常规模式，通过“共享金额度”和“共享值限额”来提高。还有一种是合田模式，也就是“BFM”模式。
A，先说常规模式。一块FN，我们假定它为A-FN。我们必须将它的YL收益再质押到新的FN中，才有共享金额度产生。这个额度只要在“共享值限额”内，就都可以转化成共享值了。
这里就会出现一个问题。再质押产生的新FN，必须租赁出去，通过KYC认证后，才能激活产生收益。而这部分租赁收益，才是这块A-FN日常可以提取的收益。如果新FN租赁不出去，没有租赁收益，也就意味着这块A-FN日常产生不了收益。只能不断地提高共享值。这当然是任何耕作者不愿意看到的。唯一解决办法，就是这块A-FN的主人，不断宣传推广Famland，迅速找到新FN的租赁人。这种运作，前期不会有啥问题。毕竟，任何人周边都有一堆亲戚朋友，让他们不用投资，只做一个KYC认证就能赚钱。这是很容易的。当每块FN都这样推广时，新FN的增长速度当然会非常快。
但是，身边的亲朋好友总是有限的，而共享值的提高是无限的。进一步的扩张，单打独斗就比较困难了。往往需要更多人合作运作。
B，再说BFM模式。BFM运作时，需要多块有一定共享值的FN才能进行。可是，哪里去找这么多有共享值的FN呢？市场当然是一个方面。可是，市场上具有共享值的FN又从哪里来？毕竟，一个人只能激活一块FN。这就迫使BFM子生态催生出一个新产业，专门的BFM产业。这个产业，就是专门为FN养成共享值，然后投放市场获利。也就是说，他们把FN作为商品来打造，盈利方向由FN产出YL转向了FN共享值养成。
要从事这样一个产业，手底下就需要有一批“证业者”。所谓“证业者”，就是专门进行KYC认证，自己不操作FN，甚至不进入Famland生态的数字地球公民。BFM从业者找到他们，只是让他们做KYC认证。每做一次KYC认证，支付给他们多少钱。后面的所有操作，都由从业者负责。从业者将他们激活养成后的FN，通过市场卖出后，又可以回过头来找他再认证一块新的FN。如此循环往复。可是，如果“证业者”有一定文化水平，会用手机上网。很快就会知道真相，而会直接进入Famland成为耕作者。不会再做“证业者”，去赚那很少一点认证费了。
在这种情况下，从业者要想获得在一定时间范围内比较稳定的“证业者”。就只能尽可能深入到一些更边远、更贫困的地区。因为，那里可能有一些文化程度很低，连手机都不会操作，更不会上网的贫民。在那里，他们可能会获得更大、更稳定的一些信息差红利。我们认为，这也是BFM从业者应得的。因为他们付出了更艰辛的努力、帮助了更不容易帮助的人群。他们甚至会去帮助苏丹难民、也门难民、阿富汗难民、墨西哥难民…… 不是他们道德有多高尚，而是他们想赚更多的钱。在Famland生态中，想赚更多的钱，只能通过帮助别人来实现。
上面仅仅是从这两个方面所作的一些最简单推演。共享农场模式一旦运作起来，各种各样的推广模式、宣传模式、扩展模式都会应运而生。或许，很多我们现在还无法想象、无法推演。但结果，都是让Famland的价值，能被世界最偏远地区、最恶劣环境中的贫困人群所共享。让Famland新经济体“普惠性公平”的阳光，照亮人类社会任何一个角落。
当稳定池资金总额达到2000亿YL，或者共享农场的共享金总额突破2000亿YL。这两个指标中的任何一个达到时，我们认为Famland新经济体的成长期结束，可以进入成熟期了。
（未完待续）
