The Need and Feasibility of the UN to Lead the Human Community in Creating a Digital Planet(046)
— An Open Letter to UN Secretary-General Guterres and Global Sages
8.1.3.3.3 The Fundamental Resolution of the Taiwan Strait Crisis
Through the specific example of Famland using SAGIPC as a mediator to resolve the Russia-Ukraine conflict crisis, I believe everyone should have understood the fundamental issue at hand, which is the future ownership of territory. If everyone truly understands that the concept of national territory will disappear in the future, and all current sovereign territories will eventually be entrusted to SAGIPC and become a public resource for all mankind, then there is no doubt that this is the most ideal outcome for human society’s territorial resources. Furthermore, this kind of development will occur naturally, without anyone being forced or coerced. People will simply choose and handle things in the most reasonable way based on their own interests. The key to achieving this is that Famland has solved the fundamental problem that “national wealth must be attached to sovereign territory”. When people can create huge wealth without being attached to sovereign territory, the meaning of national and sovereign territories disappears. This is what we emphasize, that Famland has deeply changed the economic foundation of human existence. When this change occurs, the root of all past conflicts in human history is shaken, or even ceases to exist. What contradictions or conflicts cannot be resolved?
In fact, just the concept and model of the “Shared Happiness Community” alone could fill a book. Consider this: our shared farms may have several hundred million or even several billion people, which is equivalent to a country. And our small circle may only have a few thousand people, or even just a few hundred, which is equivalent to a village. Above the village, there may be township circles, city and county circles, and state and provincial circles. These circles are formed based on common interests, hobbies, cultures, and beliefs. Globally, there are no boundaries or regional distinctions, everyone is a villager of the Earth. And the few hundred or thousand people in our small village circle are like-minded individuals who have come together on a global scale. As the ancient Chinese saying goes, “It is enough to have one intimate friend in one’s life.” How can we ask for more when we have so many friends in our lives? After living in one place for a long time, perhaps we want to move around. Sometimes we may migrate with the state and provincial circles, and sometimes we may migrate with the township circles. If the opportunity is right, sometimes we may migrate with our small village circle. We can stay in a place for as long as we like, and leave whenever we want. The world is so big, and we can keep moving and exploring different places.
We also have sovereign territory, which is each person’s private territory. When connected together, the offline manifestation is our “Shared Happiness Community” territory. Wherever we migrate, the place we live in the “Shared Happiness Community” will have the same sovereignty as national territory, like the sacred and inviolable national leased territory today, protected by SAGIPC. Other members of the shared farm who want to enter our territory must go through a similar visa process, which will be completed by SAGIPC and smart contracts.
In this new social form, even if the concept of the nation and territory still exists, it is mostly symbolic. Is it still worth fighting and struggling for? After Famland enters its mature stage, according to the future trends and thinking described above, the root of most conflicts and crises that occur between human communities in the world will be shaken or nonexistent. Resolving them would undoubtedly be much easier, and they may even disappear naturally without any deliberate effort to resolve them. Even crises as difficult as the Taiwan Strait crisis could be resolved.
Let’s speculate according to the operation mode of Famland’s shared farms and “Shared Happiness Community”. After Famland enters its mature stage, both sides of the Taiwan Strait would undoubtedly join the shared farms, and both governments would undoubtedly establish their own regional shared farm union. Let’s first discuss the possibilities for both governments, and then we will discuss the possibilities for both peoples.
A. Government Level
Assuming that on the mainland, “Chinese Shared Farm Union” is chosen as the name for its regional union. Similarly, Taiwan can choose similar names, such as “China Shared Farm Union” or “Republic of China Shared Farm Union”. Even if Taiwan insists on pursuing “Taiwan independence”, it can still choose “Taiwan Shared Farm Union”. The naming only reflects the perspective and pursuit of the builders and has no substantive significance.
Next, to attract shared farms from both sides of the Taiwan Strait, each side will spare no effort to build green, livable, and beautiful shared farm bases. During this period, the land on both sides of the Taiwan Strait is not open to each other (if it were open at this time, it would already be a formal unification). Each side is only building “Shared Happiness Community” bases on its own controlled land. At this time, we will find that the advantage of the mainland is immediately apparent. Not only towards Taiwan but also towards the United States, Europe, and any country or region in the world, this advantage is very obvious. This advantage is that the mainland can “concentrate its efforts on major issues”.
For example, in order to fulfill the wish of national reunification, the mainland can build multiple “Shared Happiness Communities” bases on the coastlines closest to Taiwan, such as Shantou, Xiamen, Fuzhou, and Wenzhou, specifically serving Taiwan compatriots. There are provincial and state-level bases with millions of people, city and county-level bases with hundreds of thousands of people, township-level bases with thousands of people, and even village-level bases with hundreds or thousands of people. Community canteens, activity centers, parks, kindergartens, welfare homes, hospitals, schools, museums, libraries, cultural centers, music halls, sports halls… everything is available. What does this mean? This means that Taiwan compatriots on the other side of the strait can move to the mainland, from a village, township, county, or even the entire population of more than 20 million in Taiwan.
Some people may criticize that even if the mainland is good, Taiwan people will not come. Limited freedom, speech restrictions, and surveillance of actions, even if the environment is good, it is useless.
At that time, the actual situation will not be like this. As we have said before, no matter which country or region’s “Shared Happiness Community,” other countries and regions’ shared farms will migrate here as a whole. This base is equivalent to a leased territory of that country or region here, with the same nature as the current embassy or consulate. During your stay, it is equivalent to your own country or region’s territory. Other people entering and leaving need to go through approval and visa procedures. Your culture, habits, system, beliefs, and freedoms, everything is the same as when you were in Taiwan. For example, a “Taipei Shared Happiness Community” base that can accommodate 2.5 million people is built here. The entire population of Taipei City can move here, and it can accommodate them. The most important thing is that everything is no different from when you lived in Taipei. If you want to march, protest, publish, or broadcast within this city area, it is the same as in Taiwan, without any restrictions. It’s just more convenient and comfortable to live here. The most important thing is that:
First, it is permanent and free. As long as you stay in this shared farm and do not request to migrate, you can permanently live in this “Shared Happiness Community” for free. Water, electricity, network, and property management are all free, without spending a penny. Even eating at the community canteen is free. Because all the costs are included in the development fee paid by the shared farm where you are located.
Secondly, it is absolutely free and safe. Not only are the officials in the city from Taiwan, but even the police and fire departments are also from Taiwan and have complete autonomy. When you leave the Shared Happiness Community, there are closed highways and high-speed railways that lead directly to the “cross-sea bridge” (which should be completed and open to traffic by then), and you can return to Taipei by crossing the bridge. You can freely travel between Taiwan and the Shared Happiness Community without any restrictions.
This kind of model, even if people doubt and do not believe it at first, will definitely have more and more people choose to live in the mainland’s “Shared Happiness Community” as time goes by.
Originally, Taiwan could also do the same and strive for mainland residents to live in the “Shared Happiness Community” in Taiwan. Unfortunately, Taiwan has obvious shortcomings. First, the space is already limited, and it is impossible to carry out large-scale development. Second, large-scale development often involves land requisition, which cannot be resolved in a short time. Therefore, even if there are some “Shared Happiness Community” bases built, they can only be scattered and it is difficult to form a large-scale effect. Not only Taiwan, even Canada and the United States, which have vast territories, face the same problem. Money is not a problem, but acquiring the land needed for base construction is the problem. In these countries, land is private, and it is not easy to purchase or requisition from private hands.
As for the mainland, not only is it known as the “infrastructure maniac” with the world’s fastest infrastructure construction speed, but more importantly, its land is public, and land requisition is very efficient. For example, in Xiong’an New District, from planning, land requisition, demolition, and construction, a new city with an area of 1,770 square kilometers that can accommodate at least 2.5 million people was built in just five years. This is still mainly based on fixed buildings. If it is based on the construction of “Shared Happiness Community” bases, with greening, beautification, and supporting facilities as the main focus, it can be completed in no more than 2–3 years. No one in the world can match this speed. In the early stage of Famland’s maturity, the construction speed of “Shared Happiness Community” bases is fast and can be put into use as soon as possible. This is of great significance, because people’s concept of real estate has not been completely eliminated. When it is said that one can permanently live here for free, this attraction is probably difficult for the vast majority of people to resist.
B. Public level
The choice of sharing farms by people on both sides of the strait is entirely free, and in this regard, the mainland undoubtedly has the advantage. This is because the APY (Annual Percentage Yield) return rate of Famland’s shared farms depends on two factors, the main one being the average shared value. Secondly, it is the size of the shared farm’s population (actually the FN scale). For the same average shared value, the shared farm with more people enjoys a higher APY. In the initial stage of Famland’s maturity, the more people in the shared farm, the higher the direct income and the faster the growth of shared value. Currently, the flow rate coefficient rule of the public beta period’s shared farm is that the flow rate coefficient of the shared farm defaults to 1, and for every 30 Famland already traded in the basic field, the flow rate coefficient increases by 0.0001. This rule will certainly be adjusted in the mature period. However, no matter how it is adjusted, the flow rate coefficient of a shared farm with a quantity level higher will be ten times higher. This has a significant impact on the APY of the shared farm.
Therefore, joining the shared farm with more people can obtain higher APY returns. In the initial stage of Famland’s maturity, this is undoubtedly the best choice for the vast majority of people. And on the mainland, any level of shared farm can easily surpass Taiwan by a quantity level. For example, on the mainland, a sixth-level shared farm with an average shared value requirement of 5000–5999 may have over 10 million people. In contrast, Taiwan’s sixth-level shared farm with the same average shared value may not even be able to organize 1 million people. Since there are no restrictions or thresholds for anyone to enter the global shared farm, why should I join Taiwan’s shared farm with fewer people if my FN shared value is already within the range of 5000–5999? Since I entered Famland, it is undoubtedly to make money. It’s unreasonable to earn less instead of more.
So, suppose I join the mainland’s shared farm and the mainland’s shared farm joins the “Chinese Union.” In that case, the “Chinese Union” will collect our farm’s development fees and build “Shared Happiness Community” for us in coastal areas. We can permanently and free of charge stay in these “Shared Happiness Community,” and we should enjoy such benefits. Everything is natural and logical. Everything has nothing to do with “unification” or “independence” but is purely a commercial and economic activity.
Due to the large population base, the mainland may have the most significant number of people in shared farms at all levels. This not only attracts Taiwan compatriots but also Chinese compatriots from Singapore, Malaysia, the United States, Canada, Australia, and other countries worldwide. The “Chinese Union” will also build bases for corresponding happiness Community, such as “Singapore Shared Happiness Community,” “Malaysia Shared Happiness Community,” “US Shared Happiness Community,” etc., suitable for them in suitable areas in the mainland, so that Chinese compatriots in these regions can enjoy the same treatment as Taiwan compatriots. Because their contributions are also included in the development fees that the shared farm pays to the “Chinese Union.”
When the situation develops to this point, how should we evaluate the unification or independence between the two sides of the strait? Speaking of unification, the entire global Chinese nation can be said to have been unified because they are all members of the “Chinese Shared Farm Union.” At this time, the Union is still fully dominated by the Chinese government. Speaking of independence, let alone Taiwan or Taipei, even a county like Hsinchu can have an independent “Concession (Shared Happiness Community)” in the mainland. Sovereignty is independent within the concession. The problem is that in such a new human civilization and new social ecology, what is the significance of talking about unification or independence? More importantly, will there still be a Taiwan Strait crisis at this time? Where is the outbreak point of the crisis? It cannot be found.
The Union of both sides of the strait may have reached a consensus to make money. Both sides can go to the other side to build Shared Happiness Community, so what is there to “unify” or “independent”? Territory is not important, and land is not important. Serving people is the most important thing.
Some people may feel that it is unfair that the mainland, with its larger population, has an inherent advantage. However, this is not the case. For example, India also has a large population and the same inherent advantage. In the era of humanism, having a larger population naturally results in an inherent advantage, which is fair and normal. The problem is that with a larger population, there is also greater service pressure. Can the inherent advantage be maintained in the long term? This is the biggest test.
For example, in the early stage of maturity of Famland, the mainland’s “Chinese Union” had a huge advantage. However, as “Shared Happiness Community” bases are built in various countries and regions, the advantage of the bases begins to decline. The shared farms in the “Union” migrate frequently, and service requirements continue to increase. Due to the large number of people and the wide geographical area involved in migration, the “Union” is simply too busy. The service quality and reputation continue to decline. At this time, the “Taiwan Union” takes advantage of the situation to help the farm members who belong to the “Chinese Union” with better services and greater sincerity. Especially at this time, the original value wealth such as APY and FN’s YL income of shared farms is no longer the mainstream income of Famland. The mainstream income has been replaced by derived wealth. The APY income brought by a large number of shared farm participants can be negligible. At this time, a large number of “convert” phenomena may occur at any time. Finally, the reputation, influence, and credibility of the “Taiwan Union” surpass that of the “Chinese Union”. It is even possible that they become the “United Dao” of the global Chinese people. Therefore, in the end, it is still: whoever wins the hearts of the people, wins the world.
Through this case, after deeply understanding the development principles and game rules of Famland’s new economic system, we can deduce the resolution model of conflicts in other regions of the world ourselves. With slight modifications for different objects, conflicts in Sudan, Armenia and Azerbaijan, Yemen, Ethiopia, and even the conflict between South Korea and North Korea can be resolved easily.
(To be continued)
The English translation is mainly done by AI and is inevitably not accurate enough. Please refer to the original Chinese text below for a more accurate understanding.
联合国引领人类社会打造数字地球的必要性和可行性（046）
— — 致联合国秘书长古特雷斯及全球贤达的公开信
8.1.3.3.3 台海危机的根本化解
通过前面Famland使用SAGIPC做调停人，解决俄乌冲突危机的具体事例。我想，大家应该看明白了一个最根本的问题，那就是领土的未来归宿问题。如果大家真的清楚，未来国家领土概念会消失，所有现在的主权领土，在不远的将来，都会托管给SAGIPC，最终成为全人类的公共资源。毫无疑问，这是人类社会领土资源最理想的归宿。而且，这样的一个发展过程，一切都自然而然。没有人强迫、没有人要挟。人们仅仅是出于利益考虑，感觉这样选择和处理最合理。为什么可以做到这一步。核心就在于，Famland解决了“国家财富必须依附在主权领土上”这个根本问题。当人们不依附主权领土，依然可以创造巨大的财富时，国家领土、主权领土的意义就消失了。这就是我们强调的，Famland让人类生存的经济基础发生了深刻的改变。当这种改变发生时，人类以往所有冲突的根源都动摇了、甚至不存在了。还有什么矛盾、什么冲突不能化解？
其实，光是“共享幸福体”这个概念、这个模式，就可以写一本书了。想想看，我们的共享农场，可能有几亿人、几十亿人，就相当于一个国家。而我们的小圈子，可能只有几千人、甚至几百人，就相当于一个村子。村子上面呢，可能还有乡镇圈，市县圈、州省圈。这些圈子的形成，都是按照共同兴趣、爱好、文化、信仰形成的。全球性的，没有国界、地域之分，都是地球村村民。而我们小村圈的几百上千人，就相当于在全球范围内，将有缘知己聚在了一起。中国古人说，人生得一知己足也。而我们的人生能拥有这么多知己，夫复何求？一个地方住久了，或许就想动一动。有时候，会随州省圈迁徙，有时呢，会随乡镇圈迁徙。如果机缘合适，有时候可能就是我们这个小村圈迁徙。哪里感觉好，就多住一段时间。感觉不好，随时可以离开。世界这么大，就这么一直不停地走，不同的地方看一看，也不一定看得过来。
我们也有主权领土，那就是我们每个人的私域领地。连接起来，在线下呈现的，就是我们“共享幸福体”的领土了。我们迁徙到任何地方，“共享幸福体”的居住地，都会享有国家领土般的主权，像现在的国家租界一样，神圣不可侵犯。由SAGIPC保障我们的安全。其他共享农场的成员，要进我们的领地，一样要经过类似现在签证的程序。只不过都由SAGIPC、智能合约去完成而已。
国家概念、领土概念，在这样的新社会形态下，即便有，也多半只是象征意义了。还值得大家这么去争、去斗吗？当Famland步入成熟期后，按照上面这种未来趋势和未来思维，世界上绝大多数发生在人类族群之间的冲突和危机，其根基都动摇或不存在了。化解起来无疑会容易得多，甚至不用刻意去化解，自然而然就消除了。即使是像台海危机这类很棘手的危机也一样。
我们不妨按照Famland共享农场和“共享幸福体”运作模式推演一下。台湾海峡两岸，在Famland进入成熟期后，民众无疑都会加入共享农场，而政府无疑都会建设自己的地区共享农场联合会。我们先说两岸政府的可能性，后面再说两岸民众的可能性。
A 政府层面
假设大陆这边，选择“中华共享农场联合会”作为自己地区联合会的名称。台湾呢，其实也一样可以选择这类名称。因为，名称是没有限制的。比如，“中国共享农场联合会”、“民国共享农场联合会”。即便台湾方面铁了心，要走“台独”道路，选择“台湾共享农场联合会”也没问题。怎么命名只反映了构建者的格局和追求，并没有什么实质性意义。
接下来，为了吸引两岸的共享农场。各自都会使出浑身解数，建设绿色、宜居、美丽的共享农场基地。由于这个期间两岸的土地，还没有对彼此开放（如果此时开放了，那已经是形式上的统一了）。各自只是在自己管控的土地上建设“共享幸福体”基地。这时候，我们会发现，大陆的优势一下子就显示出来了。不仅针对台湾，即使针对美国、欧洲，以及全球任何国家和地区，这种优势都十分明显。这种优势就是，大陆可以“集中力量干大事”。
比如，为了完成民族统一这个心愿。大陆可以在汕头、厦门、福州、温州这一条离台湾最近的海岸线上，建设起多个特别为台湾同胞服务的“幸福共同体”基地。有千万人级别的省州级基地，有百万人级别的市县级基地，也有万人级别的乡镇级基地，甚至有百人、千人级别的村落级基地。社区食堂、社区活动中心、社区公园、幼儿园、福利院，医院、学校、博物馆、图书馆、文化馆、音乐馆、体育馆…… 应有尽有，一应俱全。这什么意思呢。这就意味着，海峡那边的台湾同袍，你可以一个村、一个乡，甚至一个县市，甚至你整个台湾2000多万人都可以迁徙到大陆来。
有人会吐槽，你大陆再好，台湾人也不会来。自由受限、言论受限、行动受监督，其他环境设施再好也没用。
那时候，实际情况就不是这样了。前面我们已经说过了，无论是任何国家和地区的“幸福共同体”，其它国家和地区的共享农场整体迁徙到这里。这片基地就相当于那个国家和地区在这里的租界。其性质，就跟现在的大使馆、领事馆一样。在你居住期间，就等于是你本国、本地区的领土。其他人进出一样需要履行审批、签证手续。你的文化、你的习惯、你的制度、你的信仰、你的自由，无论什么都与你在台湾时一样。比如，这边建设了一个可以容纳250万人的“台北共享幸福体”基地。整个台北市的人口都迁徙过来，这里也容纳得下。最关键是，一切与你以前住在台北没什么两样。你在这个市区范围内，想游行、想示威，想出版、想广播，都与在台湾一样，没有任何限制。只是生活更方便、更舒适了。更重要的在于。
第一，它是永久性的和免费的。只要你还在这家共享农场、不提出迁徙，这个“共享幸福体”你可以永久住下去。而且，水、电、网络、物业，全部免费，不用你花一分钱。甚至在社区食堂吃饭都是免费的。因为，所有的费用，全包括在你所在共享农场缴纳的发展费中了。
第二，它是绝对自由和安全的。市内不仅官员，连警察和消防队都是台湾的，完全自治。走出共享幸福体市区，就有封闭式的高速公路和高速铁路直达“跨海大桥”（那时候，跨海大桥应该也修好通车了），过桥就回到台北了。你可以在台湾、共享幸福体之间自由来往，没有任何限制。
这样的一种模式，即使最开始人们怀疑、不相信。但随着时间的推移，一定会有越来越多的人选择来大陆“共享幸福体”生活。
本来，台湾方面也同样可以这样做，争取大陆居民去台湾的“共享幸福体”生活。无奈台湾地区有明显的短板，一是空间本来就有限，再做大面积开发根本没可能。二是，大面积开发往往涉及到征地，那就不是短时间能解决得了。所以，即使有一些“共享幸福体”的基地建设，也只能是零零散散的，很难形成大规模效应。不仅台湾如此，即使地大物博的加拿大、美国，也同样面临这样的问题。钱不是问题，可建设基地所需要的场地就是问题了。在这些国家，土地都是私有的，要从私人手中收购或征用，那谈何容易。
而大陆呢，不仅有“基建狂魔”之称，基建速度全球第一。更重要它的土地是公有的，征用起来非常高效。像雄安新区，从规划、征地、拆迁、建设，短短5年时间，一座至少能容纳250万人，面积1770平方公里的新城就拔地而起了。这还是以固定建筑为主，如果像“共享幸福体”的基地建设，以绿化、美化，配套设施建设为主，最多2–3年也就能完工了。这在全球无人能敌。而在Famland成熟期的初级阶段，“共享幸福体”基地的建设速度快，能第一时间交付使用。这个意义就太大了，因为人们的房地产概念还没完全消除。一说能够永久居住、还是免费永久居住，这个吸引力恐怕绝大多数人都难以抗拒。
B 民众层面
两岸民众对共享农场的选择，也是完全自由的。在这点上，大陆无疑也占尽了优势。因为Famland共享农场的APY回报率，取决于两个因素，最主要的当然是平均共享值。其次，就是共享农场的人数规模（实际是FN规模）。同样的平均共享值，人数越多的共享农场，享有的APY越高。Famland成熟期的初级阶段，一定是共享农场人越多越好。不仅是直接收益高，共享值增长也快。目前公测期共享农场流速系数规则是：共享农场流速系数默认为1，每增加30块已在基本田做市的Famland，流速系数增加0.0001。这个规则到了成熟期肯定会调整。但是，无论怎么调整，高一个数量级的共享农场，流速系数就要高出10倍。这对共享农场APY的影响当然很显著。
所以，加入人数更多的共享农场，获得更高的APY收益。这在Famland成熟期初级阶段，一定是绝大多数人的不二选择。而大陆这边，随便哪一级的共享农场，都会轻松超过台湾这边一个数量级。比如，大陆这边，平均共享值要求在5000–5999的6级共享农场。假定有1000多万人。那么，台湾这边，同样的6级共享农场，很可能100万人都组织不起来。既然全球共享农场对任何人都没有限制、没有门槛。假定我的FN共享值已经在5000–5999的范围内，我为什么不加入人数多的大陆共享农场，而一定要加入人数少的台湾共享农场呢。既然进入了Famland，当然就是为了赚钱。不赚多的，反而赚少的，没道理呀。
那我加入了大陆的共享农场，大陆的共享农场又加入了“中华联合体”。“中华联合体”收了我们农场的发展费，为我们在沿海修建了台湾同胞“共享幸福体”。我们可以永久的、免费入住这些“共享幸福体”，这样的福利该我们享受啊。一切都自然而然、顺理成章。一切，都跟“统一”还是“独立”扯不上丝毫关系，纯粹是一种商业行为、经济行为。
中国大陆由于人口基数大，各级共享农场人数可能都是世界上最多的。那不仅能吸引台湾同胞，还会吸引新加坡、马来西亚、美国、加拿大、澳大利亚等世界各国的华人同胞。“中华联合会”照样会为他们在大陆合适的地区修建“新加坡共享幸福体”、“马来西亚共享幸福体”、“美国共享幸福体”……等对应幸福体的基地，让这些地区的华人同胞都能享受到与台湾同胞一样的待遇。因为他们共享农场向“中华联合体”缴纳的发展费，也有他们的贡献。
当形势发展到这一步时，海峡两岸的统一或独立，我们该怎么评价。要说统一，全球的中华民族可以说都被统一起来了。因为，他们都是“中华共享农场联合体”的一份子。而这个联合体此时依然由中国政府全权主导。要说独立，别说台湾、台北了，就一个新竹县，都可以在大陆拥有一片独立“租界（共享幸福体）”。“租界”内主权独立。问题是，在这样的一种新人类文明、新社会生态下，谈统一，还是独立，有什么意义呢？更关键的是，这时候还会有台海危机吗？危机的爆发点在哪里？找不到了啊。
两岸的联合体为了赚钱，或许后一阶段都达成共识了。彼此都可以到对岸去建设“共享幸福体”了，还有什么可“统”，还有什么可“独”的。领土不重要了、地盘不重要了。服务好人，才是最重要的。
有人感觉这样是不是有点不太公平，意思是大陆人口多占据了先天优势。其实不存在，印度人口也多，同样有这样的先天优势。人本主义时代，人口多就必然占有先天优势。这太正常、太公平了。问题在于，人口多，你的服务压力也大。先天的优势能否保持到后天呢？这才是最大的考验。
比如，大陆“中华联合体”在Famland成熟期初级阶段优势巨大。但是，进入中级阶段后。随着各国各地区“共享幸福体”基地的普遍建设，基地的优势开始失去。“联合体”中的共享农场迁徙频繁、服务要求不断提高。由于人数太多，迁徙涉及的地方又广泛，联合体根本忙不过来。服务质量越来越差，口碑也越来越差。这时候，“台湾联合体”趁虚而入，以更好地服务、更大的诚意来帮助这些本属于“中华联合体”的农场成员。尤其是这个时期，共享农场的APY、FN的YL收益等原生价值财富，已经不再是Famland的主流收益了。主流收益已经被派生财富取代。共享农场人数多带来的APY收益，已经可以忽略不计。这时候，大量的“转体”现象就可能随时发生。最后，“台湾联合体”的美誉度、影响力、公信力，超过了“中华联合体”。以至于最后他们成了全球华人的“联合Dao”，这都有可能。所以，最终依然是：谁得人心，谁得天下。
通过这个案例，深刻理解了Famland新经济体的发展原则和游戏规则后，我们自己就可以来推演全球其他地区冲突的化解模式了。针对不同对象，只需要稍稍做一些变通，像苏丹冲突、亚美尼亚与阿塞拜疆冲突、也门冲突、埃塞俄比亚冲突，包括南韩与北朝鲜的冲突，都可以迎刃而解。
（未完待续）
